![]() ![]() That’s not necessarily the end of the road, however. Tighter Integrations to Enable Engineers? ![]() It’s clear that theme will continue after the acquisition. It could work with other CAD application’s geometry, using direct modeling methods to clean them up. Its not their problem alone, but those providers have felt the brunt of the pain as many a casual user give up on simulation driven design because removing geometric details caused model failures. Spaceclaim addressed that problem very cleanly. For ANSYS, the difficulties in using parametric feature-based CAD to prep models for simulation has always been a problem, much as it has for other simulation software providers. Geometry preparation for simulation has been the key play in the ANSYS-Spaceclaim partnership for some time. ![]() We’ll explore both of those in this blog post. But there are also some outstanding questions in my mind. Obviously, there are some moves in this acquisition that makes perfect sense. Monica Schnitger provides a pretty good overview of what exactly is going down, with a full blown history of Spaceclaim and their partnership with ANSYS. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |